Solar borehole for community water supply sizing tool

Why accurate sizing matters for solar borehole systems

Get the sizing wrong, and taps run dry in the dry season. Accurate design ensures a rural community receives reliable water year-round—even when sunlight dips and groundwater recedes. In our lab tests across 12 African sites, undersized photovoltaic arrays reduced daily flow by 37% during December–February low-irradiance periods (Global Solar Atlas). Oversizing, meanwhile, wastes capital and risks over-pumping fragile aquifers. We’ve seen boreholes in northern Nigeria collapse after extraction exceeded natural recharge by 22% (verified via step-drawdown tests). For livestock or drip irrigation, demand peaks precisely when solar resource shrinks and static water levels drop. That’s why our free online solar pump sizing tool uses dry-season irradiance—not annual averages—and requires borehole yield validation before recommending models like the MNE-3PH-5 (20.3 m³/day) or MNE-3PH-8 (38.3 m³/day). These factory-direct units have operated maintenance-light for 8+ years in Malawi and Senegal, serving 50–150 people per installation.

Core engineering formulas behind the calculator

The calculator starts with Total Dynamic Head (TDH)—the true measure of pumping effort. TDH = static lift + elevation gain + friction loss. Ignore any one term, and flow plummets. We tested this in Tanzania: a 60-m borehole with 100-m HDPE pipe lost 4.1 m of head to friction alone at 3 m³/h—enough to stall an undersized pump. The tool computes friction using the Hazen-Williams equation, calibrated for rural pipe materials like HDPE and PVC. Once TDH and daily volume are set, hydraulic power follows: P = (Q × H) / (367.2 × η). Here, η (efficiency) is critical. Cylome’s AC induction motors run at η = 0.55–0.65, verified in ISO 9906 Class 2 tests. Lower η means bigger solar arrays. For example, dropping from η=0.60 to η=0.45 increases required PV power by 33%. The tool scales array size using NASA SSE irradiance data, targeting minimum monthly sun hours—not yearly averages. This prevents summer-only operation. It then matches results to catalog models, ensuring the MNE-3PH-8 only appears when your TDH and flow align with its 11 m³/h curve under real-world irradiance.

Step-by-step: How to use the solar pump sizing tool

Manual calculations fail under field pressure. Our tool cuts errors by embedding physics into five inputs. First, enter static water level and drawdown—measured during a 2-hour test pump, not guesswork. Second, define peak daily demand: 30 m³/day for 120 people plus goats, or 25 m³ for 1 ha of maize under drip. Third, input pipe specs: material, length, diameter. The tool auto-calculates friction—critical when runs exceed 50 m, as in 78% of our West African projects. Fourth, select your region or paste irradiance from PVGIS. Finally, hit “Calculate.” The algorithm solves for motor power using η=0.60 and recommends compatible models. For a 50 m TDH and 22 m³/day demand in Burkina Faso (4.1 kWh/m²/day), it selects the MNE-3PH-5. But if your water has >500 ppm TDS, derate flow by 10%—a note the tool displays automatically. Always cross-check with borehole yield. We reject 14% of initial designs due to over-extraction risk.

Request a Quote   Browse Products

Real-world example calculation

Last dry season, we sized a system for 120 residents near Nakuru, Kenya. Static water level: 45 m. Tank outlet: 10 m above ground. Pipe: 80 m of 40 mm HDPE. Using Hazen-Williams, friction loss was 3.2 m at 2 m³/h—confirmed by on-site pressure gauges. Total TDH: 58.2 m. Dry-season irradiance: 5.6 kWh/m²/day (per NREL NSRDB). Required flow: 30 m³/day ÷ 6 sun hours = 5 m³/h. The MNE-3PH-5 maxes at 6.5 m³/h but stalls above 50 m TDH in our endurance tests. So we chose the MNE-3PH-8—rated for 58 m at 5.2 m³/h. Crucially, the borehole yield test showed sustainable yield of 32 m³/day, just above demand. Had it been 25 m³/day, we’d have added a 10,000-L storage tank. This balance—validated by our tool—delivers 98% uptime since March 2025. Skip the math. Use the sizing tool to replicate this precision.

Featured AC Solar Water Pump Models

We built these pumps after watching imported DC units fail within 18 months in dusty Sahel conditions. The MNE-3PH-SJ1 delivers 10.2 m³/day—enough for 50 people or 30 cattle—using a 0.37 kW AC motor that tolerates ±15% voltage swings. The MNE-3PH-3 pushes 12.0 m³/day through optimized impellers, same motor. For larger needs, the MNE-3PH-5 handles 20.3 m³/day up to 45 m TDH, proven in 212 Ethiopian installations since 2020. When demand hits 30–40 m³/day—as in our Kenya project—the MNE-3PH-8 steps in with 38.3 m³/day and 1.25 kW PV compatibility. All wetted parts use 304 stainless steel and ceramic shaft seals, surviving 5+ years in pH 6.2–8.4 groundwater (per ASTM G48 corrosion tests). Factory-direct inventory means 10-day lead times for standard models. No minimum order. Just specify your TDH and flow—we’ll match the right unit.

Model Code	Max Flow (m³/h)	Daily Flow (m³/day)	Motor Power (kW)	Solar Panel Power (kW)
MNE-3PH-SJ1	2	10.2	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-3	4	12.0	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-5	6.5	20.3	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-8	11	38.3	0.75	1.25

Before ordering, run your numbers through the sizing tool. It checks TDH, flow, and irradiance against real performance curves. Need help interpreting borehole logs? Send us your data—our engineers respond within 24 hours.

FAQ: Common sizing and selection questions

Field teams ask sharp questions. They know solar pumps can’t afford guesswork. Our tool answers them with physics, not promises. Below are verified responses from 300+ deployments since 2018.

How do I determine total dynamic head (TDH) for my borehole?

TDH = static lift + elevation gain + friction loss. Static lift is depth to water during pumping—not static level. Elevation gain is height to tank outlet. Friction loss? For 80 m of 40 mm HDPE at 2 m³/h, it’s 3.2 m (Hazen-Williams, C=150). We measured this in Ghana with differential pressure sensors. Always use worst-case drawdown from a 2-hour test pump. Underestimating TDH by 10% cuts flow by 18%—per our hydraulic bench tests.

Can the calculator recommend a specific Cylome pump model?

Yes. Input your TDH, daily flow, and irradiance. The tool compares requirements to ISO 9906-certified performance curves. At 58 m TDH and 30 m³/day, it selects the MNE-3PH-8—because the MNE-3PH-5’s curve drops below 4 m³/h at that head. No guesswork. Just matched hydraulics.

What solar irradiance value should I use for my location?

Use the lowest monthly average in your dry season. In Mali’s Sahel zone, that’s 3.4 kWh/m²/day in January (Global Solar Atlas). Annual averages mislead—they hide critical deficits. Our tool defaults to conservative values. You can override with PVGIS data if you have site-specific measurements.

Does the tool account for pipe friction losses?

Absolutely. Enter pipe material, length, and diameter. The tool applies Hazen-Williams with C-factors validated in our lab: HDPE=150, PVC=140. For flows under 1 m³/h, it flags potential overestimation—since laminar flow breaks Hazen-Williams assumptions. In those cases, we recommend field verification.

Is the calculator suitable for both domestic and agricultural use?

Yes. It handles 5 m³/day (50 people) to 40 m³/day (2 ha drip irrigation). In Zambia, it sized pumps for 120 households and 0.8 ha vegetable plots using the same interface. Just ensure your demand reflects dry-season peaks—and cross-check with borehole yield to prevent aquifer stress.

How does pump efficiency affect solar array sizing?

Efficiency (η) directly sets PV size. At η=0.55, the MNE-3PH-8 needs 1.25 kW panels for 38.3 m³/day. If η dropped to 0.45, it would need 1.52 kW—a 22% cost increase. Our AC motors maintain η>0.55 across 85–265V, per IEC 60034-30 tests. The tool factors this in so you don’t overspend on panels.

Technical Specifications

Model Code	Max Flow (m³/h)	Daily Flow (m³/day)	Motor Power (kW)	Solar Panel Power (kW)
MNE-3PH-SJ1	2	10.2	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-3	4	12.0	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-5	6.5	20.3	0.37	0.75
MNE-3PH-8	11	38.3	0.75	1.25