Our Company
Our CompanyQuality Products, Factory Direct
ISO 15552 vs ISO 21287 Cylinders: Key Differences and Use Cases

Home/Resources/ISO 15552 vs ISO 21287 Cylinders: Key Differences and Use Cases

comparison

ISO 15552 vs ISO 21287 Cylinders: Key Differences and Use Cases

Compare ISO 15552 tie-rod cylinders with ISO 21287 compact models for space-constrained automation systems.

Published: March 28, 2026


ISO 15552 vs ISO 21287: Which Pneumatic Cylinder Fits Your Needs?

Both ISO 15552 and ISO 21287 are widely used pneumatic cylinder standards—but they serve different automation requirements. Understanding their distinctions helps optimize performance and footprint.

ISO 15552: The Industrial Workhorse

Also known as ISO 1/2, these tie-rod cylinders offer high force capacity (bore sizes 32–320mm) and robust construction. Ideal for heavy-duty applications like packaging, material handling, and automotive assembly lines. Fully compatible with Festo DSNU and SMC CP96S series.

ISO 21287: Compact and Space-Saving

Designed for tight spaces, ISO 21287 cylinders feature a sleek profile with integrated end caps. Bore sizes range from 20–100mm, making them perfect for robotics, small-scale automation, and medical equipment. Direct drop-in replacements for SMC CJ2 and Festo ADN series.

Cylome stocks ready-to-ship models across both standards. Submit your bore, stroke, and mounting requirements—and receive a matched part number, competitive quote, and lead time within 24 hours. No more waiting 3–7 days for basic pricing.

Questions about this topic?

Our engineers are happy to discuss technical details with you.

Ask an Engineer